Impact Investors are increasingly adopting the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as their own. This can involve mapping investments to specific SDGs or even more thorough strategic alignment through the design of financial products specifically for their achievement. However, there is still a lack of awareness across the financial sector, particularly in the United States, as to what the SDGs are and how Impact Investors should interact with them.
One thing for sure is that financing the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) will involve considerable investment across sectors. Uniquely, the Impact Investing industry has the potential to play a pivotal role in the process of achieving these ambitious goals. The following article seeks to clarify some of the key points about the SDGs and raise awareness in the field.
UN Sustainable Development Goals
The 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were adopted by all 193 UN Member States in 2015 as part of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. These goals were intended as an urgent call for action to solve the world’s greatest development challenges. Ranging from an end to poverty and reduced inequality to tackling climate change and preserving the world’s oceans and forests. Each goal has individual targets and indicators as a means to benchmark progress. To illustrate, Goal 1, No Poverty has five numbered targets. The first of those targets is that “By 2030, eradicate extreme poverty for all people everywhere, currently measured as people living on less than $1.25 a day.” These ambitious goals are aimed at driving sustained change that will dramatically improve the living conditions not just for humans, but many forms of life on the planet.
Financing the SDGs
To realize the SDGs will take partnerships not just government, civil society, and business but also the financial industry. It is estimated that achieving the SDGs will take between US$5 to $7 trillion with a $2.5 trillion investment gap in developing countries. Private funding and impact investing hold significant potential to close this gap as investors can leverage large amounts of investment capital.
Mapping: The process of matching investment goals or outcomes to corresponding UN Sustainable Development Goals. For example, an investment project in a developing country that increases access to clean water for both domestic and commercial applications might be mapped to goals 3, 6, 9 and 10.
The ‘investability’ of the SDGs is a hotly debated topic, as they are widely thought to be designed primarily for use by governments. However, a 2016 report by ShareAction, UNPRI and the Baring Foundation found that 60 percent of institutional investors surveyed felt that “taking action to support the SDGs aligned with their fiduciary duties” and could “create opportunities for greater returns.” The top four SDGs identified by C-Change with the greatest potential to do this were Infrastructure (Goal 9), Economic Growth (Goal 8), Climate Change (Goal 13) and Sustainable Energy (Goal 7).
A report by UBS,In Challenge Lies Opportunity, links long term investment themes with corresponding SDGs calling out particularly investable areas such as waste management and recycling. Additionally, some Impact Investment firms, such as Dutch pension funds PGGM and APG, have rated the ‘investability’ of the SDGs and identified investment opportunities accordingly. Despite this, it is widely agreed upon that each SDG has varying levels of ‘investability’ and not all make for clearly competitive investment cases.
Drivers of Impact Investing for SDG Achievement
Impact Investing has the benefit of being targeted towards regions and sectors where traditional foreign direct investment has typically had difficulty reaching, for instance, frontier markets such as Africa or underserved communities in the United States. Additionally, these investments often target sectors that have experienced difficulties garnering investment historically, such as health and rural development. The SDGs are very focused on the improvement of these regions and sectors and so Impact Investment better aligns with the goals than traditional investment approaches.
The Dutch SDG Investing (SDGI) Agenda Report, argued that the SDGs offer a “simple and attractive entry point” for those investors not yet involved with SDG or Impact Investing from which they can build out their portfolios. Whilst the Global Impact Investing Network stated that Impact Investors can use the SDGs to “refocus and re-energize their existing activity.”
Barriers of Impact Investing for SDG Achievement
Conversely, a Center for Global Development Report found that the Impact Investing marketplace is highly fragmented which makes coordination difficult and increases transaction costs. The speed of development and evolution of the field creates issues that inhibit co-financing and the sharing of due diligence, this reduces the attractiveness of investment. Additionally, the lack of market infrastructure and favorable regulation in a majority of the Impact Investing marketplace is a hindrance to its development and also the ability to support the achievement of the SDGs.
The primary issue in the marketplace is a lack of data to measure progress. Traditional investments rely on the ability to benchmark opportunities against industry standards. Without this data, it is difficult to attract traditional investors. As well as this, there is an inconsistency of metrics between funders, creating additional issues. The Dutch SDGI Report found that there has been a growing movement in the last few years of standard setting and data aggregation, including the adoption of big data methodologies, in the hopes of mainstreaming SDG investing.
Overcoming these Barriers
Despite the numerous barriers to Impact Investing and the achievement of the SDGs there are many ways to overcome them. ShareAction recommended a number of these methods in their report, “Transforming the World” including; “making the goals relevant to investors, regulatory action, better company reporting and transparency, increased capacity for action amongst investors, demand from clients, support from other actors and tackling short-termism.”
Increased availability of evidence, data, metrics and benchmarks were also flagged as essential to overcoming these key barriers to SDG achievement. The EMPEA has suggested a step-by-step question approach to helping investors consider how they can more fully engage with the SDGs and conquer these barriers.
Source: EMPEA SDG Working Group EMPEA SDG Working Group. 2018. “Private Equity’s Role in Delivering the SDGs: Current Approaches and Good Practice.”, 11.
SDGs as a Common Language or Framework
The most important addition that the SDGs can bring to the Impact Investing industry is in the process of standardization. The United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment (UNPRI) considers the SDGs as, “the globally agreed sustainability framework”. It is now general consensus in the industry that the SDGs are a good common framework or language through which to communicate the world’s greatest challenges. The SDGs can assist investors to understand, “the sustainability trends relevant to investment activity and their fiduciary duties.”
The prevalent question in the industry now is not whether to consider the SDGs but how to do so appropriately and meaningfully. There is increasing research into this process. Impact Management and Measurement organizations, such as the Impact Management Project and GIIN IRIS+, are working on this. However, this is a constantly evolving space with no “silver bullet” defined as of yet.
SDGs Looking Forward
With such ambitious goals come challenges in achieving them and taking the extra step of linking them to investments and finding a clear way to measure success. Nonetheless, there has already been significant progress for individual goals and targets. Take for example the progress in regards to global poverty:
In 2016, just under 10 percent of the world’s workers were living with their families on less than $1.90 per person per day, down from 28 per cent in 2000. In the least developed countries, nearly 38 per cent of workers in 2016 were living below the poverty line.
As more and more resources get behind these goals from investors, public entities and private donors, the hope is that this framework can drive massive change to improve the lives of billions of people across the globe. How investors allocate resources in support of these goals has the potential to massively accelerate global progress.
Given that there is a growing demand for readily accessible impact investment options, we’ve decided to compile a list of these that are available to regular investors. We’ll work to regularly update this compilation to cover the most popular and accessible options.
Although some of these companies could be classified as “competitors” of CNote, we are avid supporters of the impact investing movement. We believe that every new dollar committed to companies focused on moving impact investing forward is a win for both CNote and society-at-large. To that end, we hope you will find this guide helpful.
Methodology and Definitions
Since impact investing is a relatively new concept for most, the standards for what is and is not an impact investment can vary. We have compiled a list of companies that we feel have been generally accepted as offering impact investment products that are accessible to investors of all sizes. We believe that these companies fairly represent the current landscape of established retail offerings accessible to investors of any net worth. As a result, products and opportunities that may only be available to foundations, trusts, and high-net-worth investors did not make our list.
We recognize that some equity-focused platforms focus on divestment, wherein companies that do not align with a specific impact approach are excluded from their portfolio of investments. Classic examples include companies that produce weapons, tobacco, and other so-called “sin” stocks. While we acknowledge this kind of socially-conscious investing, we are excited to see many platforms taking a more active approach by allocating capital directly to companies driving a beneficial social impact. After all, we believe impact investing can be so much more than a decision not to invest in a certain class of companies.
For simplicity, we’ve also tried to separate impact investing options into various categories: robo-advisors, fixed income investments, exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and other offerings. Some of these offerings have their own platforms where you can invest directly, like CNote, whilst others are available through brokers, or via direct offerings like Calvert.
Impact Investing Options
Doing business in an industry that has traditionally served the wealthiest, Aspiration has made it their mission to “bring the best financial solutions services to everyone.” Aspiration offers a mix of banking and retirement services, links to charitable giving and investment products.
Unlike other platforms, Aspiration allows customers to decide how much to pay towards their monthly fee, “what you think is fair – even if it is zero.”They also incorporate the Aspiration Impact Measurement (AIM) system into their banking which allows you to track your personal ‘People and Planet’ impact as you shop.
Summary: Aspiration largely falls in line with other impact investment options like Swell or OpenInvest. They see themselves as being “radically accessible” and serve a relatively young consumer base. Such accessibility is apparent in the variety of banking services they offer in addition to a dedicated fund.
However, the products they offer, while wide ranging, are ultimately limited. For example, they only offer the option of two investment funds, with only one, their “Redwood Fund,” impact-focused. They do however offer seven charitable causes one can donate to for a tax deduction, but these are not investment products.
Conclusion: Aspiration is a platform that caters to those seeking accessibility and those new to impact investing who may be intimidated by traditional financial products or turned-off by the modus operandi of most large financial institutions. One of Aspiration’s main selling points is their “pay what is fair” fee structure. This flexible fee structure and lack of minimum investment makes it a good option for a potential investor simply looking to get a feel for the investment landscape.
Betterment, an investment platform founded in 2008, has recently added elements of impact investing to their lineup of products. In 2017 they introduced their “Betterment SRI” (Socially Responsible Investing) portfolio strategy. They seek to blend their SRI approach with the features of their general investing strategy, stating, “We allow socially conscious investors to express that preference in their portfolios without sacrificing the aspects of Betterment’s advice that protect their returns the most: proper diversification, tax optimization, and cost control.”
Minimum: $0 for their Digital Plan; $100 000 for their Premium Plan
Fee Types: 0.25% for Digital; 0.4% for Premium
Products: US Large- Capitalization Stock
Summary: Betterment offers tax-loss harvesting and great account minimums, catering to millennials and those with an eye towards retirement. Betterments is still attempting to cohesively integrate their main investment platform with their impact investment platform. One of the main limits to their approach is that, “The ESG scoring approach to SRI does not fully eliminate companies that investors interested in SRI may consider undesirable.”
As an example they do not exclude ETFs, SUSA and DSI, whose stock offerings include investments in, “some energy companies that engage in oil and natural gas exploration, like Hess.” Betterment is not alone in this as most successful ESG investment methods often target large ETFs. Positively, Betterment is honest about its shortcomings, and its options are still relatively conservative.
Conclusion: Betterment is a serviceable investment platform, offering low minimums, great value for retirement accounts, and clear utility for people without a large disposable income. As an impact investment platform, they have an approach that is safe but relatively unambitious.
Capital Impact Partners
Capital Impact Partners is a nonprofit CDFI that seeks to leverage its thirty-plus year relationship with traditional financial institutions and other funding sources to support the equitable development of local communities. They achieve this by arranging loans tailored to the needs of their low and middle-income borrowers.
Capital Impact Partners is focused on services like; healthcare, education, affordable housing, and healthy foods for those in underserved communities. Their operating vision is to help create, “a nation of communities of opportunity built on a foundation of equity, inclusiveness, and cooperation.”
Fee Types: None
Products: Fixed Income Notes
Returns: Fixed Interest Rates according to 1 to 10-year terms
Summary: Capital Impact Partners maintains an on-balance sheet loan portfolio of $311.3 million, over a third of which has been allocated towards education. From there, housing, healthcare, and community development round out their portfolio. They tout that they have served over five million people and have created more than 37,000 jobs.
Those interested in investing through Capital Impact Partners must purchase “Capital Impact Investment Notes” through their brokerage account. This makes the process simple but limits your ability to have any real say in where your money will go. Therefore, investing in Capital Impact Investment Notes for social impact purposes requires that you largely agree with their core values and trust that your money is being put towards a meaningful cause.
Conclusion: Capital Impact Partners maintains a relatively strong AA- S&P credit rating. Coupled with their thirty-five years of business, this makes them a serviceable investment vehicle for those who share the same impact investing priorities and wish to direct funds towards the development of underserved communities.
Category: Platform & CDFI
CNote is an award-winning, first-of-its-kind financial platform that allows anyone to make money investing in causes and communities they care about. With the mission of closing the wealth gap, CNote directs every dollar invested toward funding female- and minority-led small businesses, affordable housing and economic development in financially underserved communities across America.
Fee Types: No fees for retail investors. Other services like underwriting, customized investments, and specialized impact reporting for institutional investors likely have fees.
Products: Fixed Income Investments
Returns: 2.00% product with quarterly liquidity
Summary: CNote seeks to fulfill its mission of closing the wealth gap, “by providing a new and sustainable capital source for our community-lender partners, generating better returns for our members, and by increasing capital access and economic activity in communities that need it most.”
CNote is a strong option for investors who want to support community development across America and see the tangible impact their money is having. CNote produces regular borrower stories and impact metrics to highlight just how investors dollars are driving change.
CNote supports a variety of account types and customers including personal, trust and business accounts. Additionally, CNote provides robust support for financial advisors who want to invest and manage their clients’ funds. Finally, CNote supports institutional investors and works with foundations, large banks, and other traditional financial institutions to deliver impact at scale.
Calvert was one of the first family foundations to trade mutual funds to avoid doing business during apartheid South Africa. They officially launched their portfolio and Community Investment Note in 1995. In their own words, Calvert has made it their goal, “to serve sectors and regions that are often overlooked or underserved by the traditional capital markets.”
Minimums: $20 for direct and Online Plan; $1000 for Brokerage Account
Fee Types: Brokering fee for the Brokerage Account
Products: Fixed Income Investments
Summary: Calvert has a separate mutual fund and foundation. Their foundation offers three main loan products; balance sheet loans, structured debt loans, and asset-backed facilities.
The non-profit places special emphasis on nine social impact sectors, “shaped and ever-evolving by a maturing impact investing industry and macroeconomic shifts that affect these markets.” Those impact sectors include; Affordable Housing, Community Development, Education, Environmental Sustainability, Health, Microfinance, Renewable Energy, Small Business, and Sustainable Agriculture. Calvert has a strong industry reputation, boasting a note balance of $390,870,019. They offer a return on investment in the range of 0-4%.
Conclusion: Due to its long history, Calvert has earned its place as a trusted impact investment platform. The vast majority of their loans are funded through a combination of balance sheet and structured debt loans. Overall, Calvert offers both lower and higher cost options for potential investors.
Earthfoliodoes not only bear the distinction of being the first online investment service to focus primarily on sustainable investing, but in 2015 they also launched their app. Earthfolio screens its investments against 10 ESG criteria. These stated ESG criteria include; Environment, Animal Welfare, Equality and Diversity, Non-Violence, Healthy Living, Corporate Governance, and Community Development.
Minimums: $25 000
Fee Types: 0.5% annual fee
Product: ETFs, Stocks, Bonds, Mutual Funds
Summary:“Sustainability is not a niche for us,” Earthfolio states on their site, “it’s the DNA of how we’ve invested for over fifteen years. Every portfolio we build invests exclusively in a broad spectrum of sustainable mutual funds that screen on up to ten environmental, social, and governance, criteria.”
Earthfolio is a good choice for those looking for a more established platform, given that it is one of the oldest options on this list. Earthfolio caters to customers with $25,000 or more available to invest in any of their range of product offerings. Given this high minimum, Earthfolio may seem out of reach for young people looking to make an impact investment.
Conclusion: For an investor that has $25,000 or more to get started and wants a platform with a long track-record, Earthfolio offers a good set of products that is likely to fit most investors’ needs.
Hedgeable is similar to the other relatively new impact investment platforms on the list. Their mission, “to democratize the market!” seems to be exemplified by their very low minimums and the unique range of SRI themes they offer. Hedgeable focuses on eight different themes for its SRI platform; U.S. Social Responsibility, International Social Responsibility, LGBTQ Equality, Low Carbon Footprint, Alternative Energy, Female Leadership, Social Fixed Income, and Water Purification and Conservation.
Summary: With the motto “Private Wealth for Everyone,” Hedgeable offers a $1 minimum for opening an account and a range of personal, retirement, and corporate accounts. To fulfill their mission statement, Hedgeable allows individuals access to portfolios with, “customized asset allocation that can include access to asset classes typically reserved for only the wealthiest investors.”
Hedgeable is considered one of the better robo-advisors in the market right now because of the services and options it provides, according to Business Insider, but Hedgeable is not great for those starting out. As Conroy demonstrates in magnifymoney.com, those with accounts under fifty thousand dollars will be charged a 0.75% fee, while those with assets under management between one to ten million dollars face a 0.3% fee.
Conclusion: Hedgeable has a lot to offer as an impact investment platform. However, if you are a potential investor just getting started, there are other platforms out there that do not charge these fees. If you are an investor with a relatively large account, Hedgeable caters to you.
Category: Sustainable Investment Funds – ETFs
Summary: iShares is a family of exchange-traded funds managed by BlackRock. As implied by Larry Fink’s Letter to CEOs, BlackRock’s iShares platform has increasingly been placing an emphasis on its more sustainable investment offerings. The firm breaks down sustainable investing into four key categories: ESG investing, Thematic Investing, Impact Investing, and Screened Investing. iShares offers separate ETFs for each category.
Rates will vary across investment offerings and level of management.
Note: To invest in ETFs issued by iShares, you’ll need to have a brokerage account that allows you to buy and sell public equities and ETFs. There may be fees and other transaction costs associated with individual brokerage accounts.
Motifis a thematic investing app, meaning that they have compiled a group of stocks related based on a theme that one can invest in, as opposed to allowing investors to select individual companies or stocks. Describing thematic investing in their own words, Motif states, “We analyze data to uncover important trends driving the economy. Then we create dynamic portfolios of companies with exposure to these trends so that you can easily invest in them.”The three main investment themes in which Motif places primary focus are; Fair Labor, Sustainable Planet, and Good Corporate Behavior.
Minimum: Depends on the package/service you choose
Fee Types: None for Next Wave Portfolio; 0.25% annual fee for Motif Impact Portfolios; 0.5% annual fee for Motif Thematic Portfolios
Products: Stocks, ETFs, etc
Summary: They define Motif as a, “basket of up to 30 stocks or ETFs intelligently weighted to reflect an investment theme, market insight or innovative trend.” One problem that some investors may have with Motif is the fact that dividends are not automatically reinvested. This slows down the investing process and, since it usually costs $4.95 per trade, makes the overall investing experience more expensive. Their management fee is also a cause of concern, as it is just an approximation and not the sum total of what it costs to do business with them.
Conclusion: Motif sells the idea of thematic investing because it is more comprehensive for investors who want to invest in causes rather than in single stocks. Motif has the issue of not reinvesting dividends automatically, which makes reinvesting feel cumbersome. With that said, it still gives investors the opportunity to make long term investments for issues they want to see change or transform with their investment.
Newday, launched mid 2018, is a financial technology and institutional asset management company with the mission to, “spread the power of investing with your conscience”. Their portfolio is a “custom-made, proprietary, and targeted investment strategy” where customers can benefit their choice of 6 impact areas; Gender Equality, Fresh Water, Ocean Health, Global Impact, Climate Action and Animal Welfare. Investment is possible through their mobile app.
Fee Types: 1% annual fee
Products: Stocks, Custom Portfolios
Summary: Newday’s target demographic appears to be millennials as investment is strictly available via their mobile apps for IOS and Android phones, with plans to introduce a web-based platform in the near future. Customers can choose their impact, risk level and schedule recurring investments, via the app. They focus heavily on financial education with the “Learn” tab on their webpage as a key focus, regularly spotlighting companies they invest in and explaining their reasoning for said investment.
They currently offer six equity portfolios consisting of approximately 20 to 40 individual stocks, with the aim of also introducing socially responsible checking and savings accounts later this year. All of their portfolios, except Animal Welfare, were built to reflect the 17 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Newday also donates 5% of their revenue from asset management fees to their NGO partners who include; Conservation International, Lonely Whale Foundation, Global Fund for Women and Water.Org.
Conclusion: A Robo-advisor for millennials new to impact investing who want to learn as well as invest. The Newday platform is easy to use, transparent and affordable, allowing users to personally tailor their account according to their investment preferences and recommendations from Newday. However, Newday is still in its infancy with just over $1 million under management and is by no means a tried and tested method of investment.
Created in 2015, OpenInvest has a mixed approach, allowing you to compile a portfolio based on 12 different issue options. Of these, six are divestment strategies and six are investment strategies. Openinvest states that it is, “dedicated to using technology to bring honesty and transparency to financial services, while making socially responsible investing easy and more accessible.”
Fee Types: 0.5% annual fee
Product: Equities, some ETFs, Bonds, Mutual Funds, Custom Portfolios
Summary: While OpenInvest offers a similar package to other new impact investment platforms on the market with regard to price, they, on the whole, take stronger political and moral stances than the other platforms on this list. They strongly value a commitment to the political stances they take and have admitted to, “frequently turning away customers who are not ready to invest or whose needs are met elsewhere.” They offer a new technology that allows members to proxy vote via their app, which may be appealing to some investors.
If your political beliefs align with OpenInvest, then you will probably love the platform. If they don’t, however, you might want to look elsewhere. They’ve recently received venture funding from a large group of respected investors, which may mean they’ll expand their product offerings in the near future.
Conclusion: For an impact investor who truly identifies with their message and political stances, OpenInvest is a good option. If you want to ease your entry into impact investing, there are other options that don’t require such a minimum investment or the support of their strong political positions.
Category: Robo-advisor, Account Aggregator
Personal Capital is a personal wealth management system that is focused on making investing simple even for a wide range of investor risk profiles. Within its portfolio of services, Socially Responsible Investing (SRI) is a key part of the firm’s offerings. By partnering with Sustainalytics, a global leader in ESG research and ratings, Personal Capital is able to help users curate stock portfolios that meet their individual impact preferences.
Summary: Personal Capital encourages companies to connect all their financial accounts to get a “complete financial picture.” They then encourage customers to connect with an in-house financial advisor to create a retirement plan. Taking a hybrid approach, Personal Capital claims to “combine award-winning technology and financial tools with experienced people to create the smart, easy way to transform your financial future.”
Fee structures as of November 2019 are:
First $1 million: 0.89%
First $3 million: 0.79%
Next $2 million: 0.69%
Next $5 million: 0.59%
Over $10 million: 0.49%
Conclusion: If you’re looking to streamline the management of your finances and want help from a professional advisor managing your money Personal Capital may provide the right mix of human and technological touches. Their fees are competitive and they offer a suite of free tools to help educate and convert clients.
RSF Social Finance
Category: Social Investment & Donor Advised Funds
RSF Social Finance offers a diverse range of funds and makes a point to promote transparency as a key feature of their investment model, “We believe that inquiry and dialogue are essential to transforming people’s relationship with money and moving the economy toward greater equity.” RSF Social Finance organizes quarterly “community price gatherings,” where investors and borrowers have a chance to meet and where quarterly interest rates are decided, in addition to “Shared Gifting Circles,” which “give participants distribution and allocation authority over grant funds.”
Minimums: $1000 for Social Investment Fund; $100 000 for Regenerative Economy and Food System Transformation Funds
Fee Types: N/A for Social Investment Fund; 0.6% annualized Investment Fee in addition to a 0.75% – 1.25% annualized “Community Contribution” for Donor Advised Funds
Product: Various Specialty Funds
Returns: 1.25% (decided quarterly) for the Social Investment Fund; 1% annualized for the Regenerative Economy and Food System Transformation Funds
Summary: RSF Social Finance offers various fund options. The Social Investment Fund provides direct investment into social enterprises in the fields of climate & the environment, education & the arts, and food & agriculture. Meanwhile, the assets held in the Donor Advised Funds are kept in a, “mission-aligned investment portfolio, which seeks safe and liquid cash opportunities that achieve deep impact.”
RSF Social Finance have claimed a 100% repayment rate of principal plus interest to investors in every year since its 1984 inception. With that said, the 1.25% return for the Social Investment Fund has only begun for the 2019 calendar year, previously hovering between 0.75% to 1.00%. The relatively high minimums for the funds are offset by minimum-free gifting options like Money to Transform, Shared Gifting and their Seed Fund.
Conclusion: Their giving options are all designed to give individuals who believe in the same mission the chance to put their own money towards the value-driven organizations and entrepreneurs identified by RSF. Overall, their diverse product offering, long track-record, and above-average transparency makes it a worthy option on this list.
Stash explains that their core mission is making financial opportunity and literacy available to everyone. Their focus is on making investing as simple as possible, with younger investors serving as their target clientele. They encourage their users to, “Think big, start small” and offer custodial investment accounts for those under 18 years of age. The main investment themes on their platform are; Clean Energy, Reduction of Carbon Footprint, LGBTQ Rights, Gender Equality, Water Conservation, and other ESG focused companies.
Minimum: $5 upfront for Investment Account; $15 minimum for Retirement Account
Fee Types: $1 per month for under $5000, 0.25% fee annually for over $5000 for Investment Account; $2 per month fee for Retirement Account
Products: ETFs, Bonds, Commodities, Banking, etc
Summary: Stash offers packages like “The Activist” or “The Techie.” It is similar to peers in the space, offering a variety of ways to make investing, especially with regard to SRIs, accessible. They are a thematic investment option that allows investors to invest in theme-based ETFs. There are 33 ETFs options on the app. Stash also allows you to buy fractional shares, usually reinvesting in individual stocks or in one of their other themed ETFs.
Stash works well for beginners because it offers guidance and teaches basic terminology, but it may come at a cost. According to both College Investor and Nerdwallet, investing in Stash is more expensive because of the $1 per month fee which eats into your return as opposed to just investing directly in an ETF.
Conclusion: Stash sought a way to make investing easier and less intimidating. In the end, it faces similar issues that other ESG platforms encounter. If you are an experienced investor looking for an app to use for a long time, it might be better to look elsewhere. With that said, Stash is still a decent option for novice investors who are just starting out and want to make a difference with their money.
Category: Peer-to-peer Lending Service
Streetshares is a peer to peer lending service that offers business loans to small businesses and those owned by veterans and current members of the United States Armed Forces. Their mission is to, “Bring trusted digital finance to America’s heroes.” While their website prominently features their commitment to supporting the military and veterans, one doesn’t have to be a military member to apply for a loan from Streetshares or invest in the loans they offer.
Fee Types: N/A
Products: Veteran Business Bonds
Returns: Up to 5% interest
Summary: Streetshares offers 3- 36 month terms for financing and lines of credit as low as $2000. As opposed to other funding and lending services, Streetshares offers relaxed borrowing qualifications as well as forgoing an application fee which is different from other community lending services. The most anyone can invest on Streetshares is $500,000, and the minimum is $25 for their Veteran Business Bonds. People start receiving interest within 2-5 days as well as receiving funds within 3-7 days.
Conclusion:For those interested in peer-to-peer lending and supporting former service members, Streetshares is a solid choice. It is a dynamic platform for those wanting to invest in a place supporting veterans with a broad yet set list of investing options.
Wealthsimple, Canada’s largest robo advisor, gives customers the option of, “investing on autopilot” through a variety of asset classes, tax loss harvesting, and even offers to manage your first $5000 for free. It also offers a halal investing option for investors who follow and practice Islamic law. It puts a lot of its ESG investing focus on investing in low cost ETFs.
Fee Types: 0.4%- 0.5%
Summary: “Put your money on autopilot!” is an easy slogan to get behind but can often become a dangerous notion to apply, as many critics have noted regarding Wealthsimple’s investment strategy and product offerings. Fees depend upon the amount of money you store in your account, as accounts lower than $100,000 incur an annual fee of 0.5% as compared to the 0.4% fee that accounts with more than $100,000 face.
The main criticism lobbed at Wealthsimple, however, is that it has a conflict of interest in investing in PDF and PHR, which are owned by Som Seif, a board member of Wealthsimple. Both these ETFs don’t trade at the same volume and are not near the price range as the other ETFs on the list, which raises questions as to why they are included in its investment offerings.
Conclusion: How they use their platform to please their customers will always be a question that lingers for Wealthsimple. Beyond acting as an impact investment platform, they have one billion dollars under their tutelage and are invested in ETFs committed towards low carbon emissions, clean technology, gender diversity, affordable housing, and sustainable growth. At the very least, Wealthsimple serves as an example as to how ESG investing can be a complicated enterprise for everyone involved.
Category: Specialized Solar Project Investments
The Wunder Group is a fintech company founded in 2013 in Boulder, Colorado. Its parent company, the Wunder Group, uses venture capital to help fund the solar projects that WunderCapital promotes. Its motto is to, “Do well and do good,” presumably by investing in solar projects through their curated solar energy portfolios.
Product: Solar Energy Funds
Returns: Depending on the fund, between 6%- 7.5%
Summary: WunderCapitalmanages solar energy investments and construction for solar energy projects. WunderCapital has a singular goal in mind in prompting solar energy projects and because of this, WunderCapital lacks diversity, leaving it subject to a precarious sector of environmental investing. On top of that, one must be an accredited investor in order to invest in WunderCapital.
Conclusion: WunderCapital has a relatively high minimum compared to other options on this list, but a 0.25% annual fee is hardly unreasonable when all is said and done. If you are an accredited investor and are specifically interested in investing in the solar energy space, WunderCapital could be the right option for you.
We hope that this list provides you with a better idea of the various retail impact investment options available today. Before pursuing this line of investing, it is important to note that pooled equities or ETFs may contain stocks that contradict your overarching investment goals. For example, the gender diversity ETF, SHE, holds shares in ConocoPhillips and Occidental Petroleum Corporation, among others, which might be at odds with an overall portfolio strategy targeting renewable energy sources. Be sure you do your own research before you commit to any of the platforms on this list. It’s often useful to dig a bit to find out the true level of impact and rigor around portfolio construction associated with any investment option you choose.
As the industry matures, impact investing space will need to address these kinds of issues, but there is hope for socially conscious investors. The diversity of impact investing options on this list speaks to the market demand of investors that value social and financial returns. According to Christopher Skroupa in the Forbes article In ESG We Trust — The Risk And Rewards Of ESG Investing, “… impact investing has grown 97% in the past decade.” We believe that this trend will only continue in the years to come, and we hope that you too will soon be part of it
Given the negative impressions people typically have of the financial services industry, a lot of these platforms are making a concerted effort to make themselves accessible, including CNote. As this space continues to grow, one can only hope to see the clear impact that these businesses and platforms provide to society as a whole. We hope this list helps you find solutions that allow you to align your investments with your values.
At its core, impact investing is about deploying capital with the intent to bring about some socially desirable outcome with the expectation of a financial return.
There are two key elements:
An Investment with the Intention to Do Good
An expectation of Financial Returns
Baked into this definition is some subjectivity. Specifically, what may be a socially desirable outcome for one person may not be the same for another.
Nonetheless, generally, the social outcomes investors seek are unlikely to face much dispute even from the most critical investors. Some of the causes impact investments often support include; lowering greenhouse gasses, eradicating poverty, increasing economic opportunity for underrepresented communities and feeding the hungry. The expectation of financial returns is significant because it is what separates impact investing from philanthropy.
What else should I factor into the definition?
In addition to the two basic elements, an intention to do good and expectation of financial returns, some institutions add a third factor, impact measurement.
The thought is if you intend to do good, you should measure how much good you’re doing. We explore measurement in more detail later.
Within these 3 elements, there’s a lot of wiggle room, often guided by individual investor’s goals and personal interests, their priority on returns vs social outcomes, and the methodology they apply to outcome measurement.
The Fluidity of the Definition of Impact Investing
Given that impact investing is a relatively new concept, its definition can vary based upon who you ask. McKinsey explains this well:
“‘Impact investing’ means different things to different people. Some see it as a strategy for beating financial benchmarks, because businesses that target unmet social or environmental needs can be profitable but easy for investors to overlook. Others are happy to accept lower financial returns for the sake of backing enterprises whose main interest is creating social benefits.”
As suggested above, impact investing can be associated with an acceptance of below-market returns. While this is certainly true for some products, many impact vehicles now work to meet or beat market returns.
How Do Industry Participants Define Impact Investing
One of the leading voices in impact investing, The Global Impact Investing Network (GIIN) defines impact investing as “Investments made into companies, organizations, and funds with the intention to generate social and environmental impact alongside a financial return.”
Michael Drexler and Abigail Noble of the World Economic Forum define impact investing as “an investment approach intentionally seeking to create both financial return and positive social impact that is actively measured.”
The Financial Times also includes measurability in its definition, “Impact investing is generally accepted to describe investing that intentionally seeks measurable social and environmental benefits.”
As you can see there are some common threads within the definition. As the industry matures, it is likely a standard definition will be accepted by all stakeholders.
How does CNote define Impact Investing?
At CNote we agree with the generally recognized definition that impact investing involves deploying capital with the aim of creating some measurable positive social outcome with the expectation of financial returns.
Where we diverge is our belief that every investment is actually “impact investment.”
Because whether or not you are targeting a social outcome when investing, your investment decisions will have consequences on society. This is because the flow of capital will incentivize or disincentivize actions by entrepreneurs and businesses on the aggregate–intentional or not, your money has an impact.
Ultimately, the important question we should ask before we make any investment is: What social outcomes does this investment support, and are those outcomes aligned with my goals and values?
The question then is one of intentionality; are you being conscious about what your money is doing and are you aligned with the outcomes it is supporting? This is extremely important knowing that even small investments in the aggregate can drastically shape industries, corporate behavior, and societal outcomes.
In recognition of the notion that every investment choice has a consequence, our hope is that in the long term, impact investing as a standalone term becomes redundant and will just be called “investing.” As impact investing matures and becomes more standardized and measurable, many of the “niche” metrics we use now to measure impact may become as essential as metrics like the Price/Earnings ratio.
Why does the definition of Impact Investing matter?
How and where you invest is important. Understanding how the industry and individual participants approach impact investing can help you ask more informed questions and ultimately make better choices for where you want to put your money to work.
Impact investing, as a movement, is still evolving and seeking standardization. It is important to understand how various industry leaders define the term and how it affects their approaches and methodologies–which can vary widely.
At CNote, we want you to make the most informed investment choices. Hopefully, this article leaves you with a better understanding of how to approach impact investing as an investment strategy.
Impact Investing Metrics and Themes
The GIIN (Global Impact Investing Network) has created Impact Reporting and Investing Standards (IRIS) metrics to provide a standardized way to compare different investment options. While the GIIN is highly regarded, there are over 500 metrics and applying and making sense of these metrics can be challenging for the unfamiliar and can be cumbersome for even experienced impact investment practitioners.
Another route towards standardization is by aligning investments with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The 17 SDGs were adopted by all 193 UN Member States as part of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. These goals are an urgent call for action to solve the world’s greatest development challenges, ranging from an end to poverty and reduced inequality to tackling climate change.
Many impact investors are now aligning their goals and investments with the SDGs. The general consensus is that they are a useful framework and common language through which we can all communicate broader sustainability efforts. It is also generally appreciated that alignment is an ongoing process with most still trying to figure out how to get it right.
As a result, there are movements by impact investors and measurement institutions to incorporate the SDGs into their impact measurement frameworks. Toniic institute has developed the SDG Impact Theme Framework and the IRIS metrics have been aligned with SDG indicators that they deemed appropriate for investment. Moreover, IRIS is launching, IRIS+, which should include a more comprehensive look at the SDGs.
Another group working on this is the Impact Management Project, a forum of 2000+ impact investing practitioners. Having just completed Phase 2 of the development process they are looking to build consensus on ‘how to measure, report, compare and improve performance.’
The complexity of these metrics highlights another issue, the approach to impact investing depends on who the investor is.
To illustrate, large institutional investors may specifically require; risk models, impact measurement audits and put in place other restrictions that a retail investor may not. Moreover, a retail investor may want to see tangible short-term outcomes; homes built or jobs created, among other metrics, whereas an institutional investor may have a longer time horizon or seek outcomes that are harder to quantify. Understanding the audience and their expectations will radically shape how one views a given impact investment.
History of Impact Investing
The term ‘Impact Investing’ was created in 2008 at meetings convened by the Rockefeller Foundation in Italy. Although the definition is relatively new, the tradition of Socially Responsible Investing (SRI) is not. Religious communities have been practicing SRI for thousands of years and it can be traced to biblical times, as outlined in Jewish and Sharia law. This SRI involved making no investment in alcohol or tobacco, which is today regarded as negative screening. United-States-based SRI can be traced back to the 18th Century to the Methodists who also employed negative screening, extending it to include gambling as well, and to the Quakers who banned investment in slavery and war.
The modern roots lie in the Vietnam and Civil Rights Movements notably with South African Apartheid and divestment from the country. In the 1990s and 2000s, this shifted from negative screens to positive screens. The term broadened and in the preceding decades impact investing as it is today was born.
Today, impact investors can be, but are not limited to; fund managers, development finance institutions, foundations, government agencies, NGOs, pension funds and insurance companies, religious institutions, and individuals. Recently there has also been a rise in the number of online impact investing platforms, like CNote, which have made impact investing widely accessible to all individuals.
Impact Investing Approaches
The existence of impact investing highlights the current paradigm shift in how the business and investment community is thinking about; place, planet, product, and processes. This shift materialized as the double bottom line approach, which is measuring performance in terms of not just financial considerations but also social impact, and triple bottom line which adds environmental impact into that discussion. This evolved into SRI, and the introduction of negative screening, and ESG which incorporates Environment, Social and Governance factors into the investment process.
Socially Responsible Investing (SRI) vs. Impact Investing
Socially responsible investing is focused on deploying investment dollars in a responsible and positive way. Typically SRI involves the use of negative screens or filters when selecting investments. Often these screens ensure that a fund avoids investing in certain things the fund manager deems undesirable like companies that produce weapons, tobacco, and oil.
In contrast, impact investing actively seeks out investments that will create a positive economic, social, or environmental impact. Another way to think about this is as “do no harm” for SRI versus “do good” for impact investing.
What about Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Investing?
ESG investing is about critically viewing an investment target’s environmental, social, and governance practices in the due diligence phase of investment. The key difference between ESG and impact investing is that ESG typically serves as a screen to weed out companies with unacceptable practices, whilst still prioritizing the maximization of financial returns.
For example, let’s say an institutional investor was evaluating investments in multinational clothing companies, they may view supply chain practices as a key ESG metric because they want to make sure any target companies avoid the use of child labor and ethically source their raw materials.
ESG is most commonly used in the context of public market investing, where one is evaluating the environmental, social and governance structures of a given company and evaluating whether that entity is taking sufficient steps to meet or exceed specific areas of corporate responsibility.
Impact Investing occurs across asset classes and with a broad range of financial instruments. The main asset classes include; fixed income, real assets, public and private equity and private debt. The majority of impact investments are currently in private equity and private debt. There are ongoing discussions by many in the field about whether impact investing could emerge as its own asset class because it drives development and uses specialized metrics and benchmarks, but this is yet to be seen.
Returns will vary greatly based on the type of investment and the market size related to the social issue. While the market for improving crop yields in developing countries is likely large, both in terms of potential financial and social rewards, the same may not be true for addressing something like increasing societal interest in the arts.
What to expect for financial returns depends solely on the strategy and philosophy of the investor. Anyone considering an impact investment, or any investment would be well served to ask the fund manager or company, about what their priorities are, how they measure success, risk, and other non-investment outcomes.
How popular is Impact Investing?
What many don’t realize is that impact investing has grown to become a serious force in the investment world which dictates the flow of billions of dollars in capital each year. In 2017, according to GIIN’s Annual Impact Investor Survey of 225 companies, the total amount invested in impact funds was at least $114 billion. This is up from 2015 and 2016 when the impact investing market totaled $7.1 billion and $15.2 billion, respectively.
Financial giants like Goldman Sachs and Zurich Insurance are now earmarking $13.7 billion toward impact investing. BlackRock, the world’s biggest asset manager, has created a division solely devoted to impact investments. There is also attention from international organizations like the UN which has gathered over $62 trillion USD from more than 1,500 asset managers to fund the Principles for Responsible Investment.
Established institutions aren’t the only ones interested in impact investing. Since 2008, Google search reports for “impact investing” have increased significantly. The trend does not show any likelihood of tapering.
In a recent survey of over 1,300 financial advisors and analysts, the CFA Institute found over 50% considered ESG integration a major priority and were taking steps to include it in their analysis.
Moreover, the world is about to see a massive transfer of wealth from baby boomers to millennials. By 2020, millennials will have an estimated cumulative wealth of $24 trillion, and surveys show a whopping 76% of them believe how they invest can have an impact on responsible investing. Further studies show that millennials are 2x more likely than the average investor to invest in companies with social or environmental goals. Explore more statistics indicating the rising trend at Morgan Stanley.
Why Impact Investing?
Here are just a few reasons to impact invest. This list is not exhaustive, and what moves one investor may ring hollow for another.
Align your investments and your values – because impact investing does good and generates financial returns, investors can support the causes they care about whilst putting their capital to work.
Increase Portfolio Stability – A Morgan Stanleystudy, of over 10,000 equity mutual funds over 7 years, found that, on average, impact investing funds had lower volatility than comparable non-impact funds.
Expand your network – The impact investing community includes ppolicymakers entrepreneurs, human rights activists, and development experts, all dedicated to utilizing capital in pursuit of tackling important societal issues.
Critiques of Impact Investing
The world of impact investing is not without faults. Like any booming industry, there are those who would co-opt the concept for profit. Impact investing is having a golden moment of rapid growth and popular support and, according to Business Wire, is expected to grow to $307 billion by 2020 (2x what it was in 2017). As a result, some investment vehicles ostensibly use the “impact investing” label without actually committing to the underlying strategy, in an effort to attract investors.
Sometimes this is referred to as ‘greenwashing’. In the impact investing industry, there are many that are concerned that mainstream asset managers are increasingly promoting and marketing ‘impact strategies’ without sufficient evidence that they are following through with these claims, measuring and reporting towards them. Unfortunately, this means that impact investors must carefully review investment documents and scrutinize impact measurement practices to assure that the product they are investing in accomplishes what it claims to do.
Another potential pitfall of impact investing is a lack of understanding or analytical rigor around quantifying the effect an investment has on a specific issue (like affordable housing). For example, with microloans, lenders track number of borrowers, repayment rate, and business growth. However, knowing this information doesn’t necessarily capture the true impact, or what that community would look like without its microloans. In some instances, measurement may be too difficult given a myriad of variables, in other cases, it may simply be impossible to fairly measure a given investment’s impact.
Another popular critique is that impact investing is skewed towards the wealthy and, by allowing for positive social impact and market-rate returns, keeps the concentration of wealth with the already well-off.
Whether you actively seek to align your dollars with your values, it’s clear that impact investment is rapidly growing and is changing the status quo of capital allocation. Traditionally, funding and loans were only available to people with great credit or leverageable assets. Impact investing changes this dynamic by looking beyond financials and seeing whether your investment will generate positive social returns, not just financial ones. Ultimately, impact investing breaks down the perceived wall that exists between capitalism and social good. We can have our cake and eat it, too.
Let us know what you think about this piece! What information do you wish we included or what questions do you still have? Email firstname.lastname@example.org
There is an ever-growing library of resources for learning more about impact investing on the web. Here are some good resources if you’re looking to dive deeper on impact investing
The GIIN site includes resources for continued learning about impact investing, including case studies and research: https://thegiin.org/
Our securities consist of various promissory notes (“Notes”) that are offered to eligible investors pursuant to Regulation A+ and Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. We direct the capital invested through the issuance of our Notes to partner Community Development Financial Institutions and Low-Income-Designated Credit Unions, who use that capital to offer financial products and resources to the communities they serve, funding small business owners, affordable housing development, other community-centered projects.
For more information on risks related to investing in our Notes, please see our latest filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the terms of the applicable offering documents. Neither the SEC nor any state securities regulator has passed upon or endorsed the merits of any investment decision into CNote’s offerings.
CNote is not a bank, and investments in our Notes are not bank deposits. Unless otherwise specified in the offering documents of a CNote product, CNote investments are not insured by the FDIC or by any other governmental agency.
Investing in our Notes involves risk of loss, including the principal invested. We encourage you to consult with a financial adviser or investment professional to determine whether or not an investment in our Notes makes sense for you.
CNote is not an investment adviser or a broker-dealer, and does not provide investment, legal, or tax advice. Information provided herein is for educational purposes only and is not tailored for any individual investor. It should not be relied upon as financial or investment advice. Any projected returns are based on the current interest rate offered on our Notes, which may be subject to change, and is not guaranteed. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.